K. Brcic, Town Planner
i) Notice of Complete Application and Public Meeting: Zoning By-law Amendment, dated September 22, 2020;
ii) Planning Report of K. Brcic, Town Planner, dated September 28, 2020;
iii) Proposed By-law 92-2020, being a By-law to amend By-law 1-2014, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Town of Kingsville.
Ms. Brcic presented the Planning Report. As stated within the Report, one comment had been received from a resident that the zoning should be limited to the church use and the commercial zoning removed. Ms. Brcic advised Council that since the preparation of the report one additional comment was received from a resident with a similar concern that the property should not be allowed to have multiple zoning usages, and that the zoning should be solely limited to the church use.
Comments from the Applicant's Representative:
Solicitor David Hummel, representing the Purchaser (Carlos Braun) and the Words of Light Church in Staples, stated that his client has no intention to use the property for any other use, except as a place of worship. He indicated his client does intend to keep a few of the bowling lanes in the building for the children to use.
Mayor Santos advised that a similar application was made several years ago at Main St. West near Heritage Road (a former commercial facility at that location was rezoned to permit a Church use). Ms. Brcic was not aware of such prior application.
Ms. Brcic, upon reviewing the Town's Planning records in regard to that site, confirmed that in that circumstance there was a site specific re-zone and the permitted uses (general commercial) were included, along with a place of worship, however, the word 'or' was included in the Permitted Uses section of the by-law.
Ms. Brcic indicated that she would add the word 'or' in the permitted uses section of proposed By-law 92-2020, if that is the direction of Council, so that the Permitted Uses would read: "i) Those uses permitted under Section 8.6 Rural Commercial (C6); or ii) A church;".
Solicitor Hummel commented that he believed his client would have no concerns with such an amendment.
There were no further comments or questions.